Discovering social learning ecosystems during clinical clerkship from United States medical students' feedback encounters: a content analysis.

PURPOSE: We examined United States medical students' self-reported feedback encounters during clerkship training to better understand in situ feedback practices. Specifically, we asked: Who do students receive feedback from, about what, when, where, and how do they use it? We explored whether curricular expectations for preceptors' written commentary aligned with feedback as it occurs naturalistically in the workplace. METHODS: This study occurred from July 2021 to February 2022 at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. We used qualitative survey-based experience sampling to gather students' accounts of their feedback encounters in 8 core specialties. We analyzed the who, what, when, where, and why of 267 feedback encounters reported by 11 clerkship students over 30 weeks. Code frequencies were mapped qualitatively to explore patterns in feedback encounters. RESULTS: Clerkship feedback occurs in patterns apparently related to the nature of clinical work in each specialty. These patterns may be attributable to each specialty's "social learning ecosystem"­the distinctive learning environment shaped by the social and material aspects of a given specialty's work, which determine who preceptors are, what students do with preceptors, and what skills or attributes matter enough to preceptors to comment on. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive, standardized expectations for written feedback across specialties conflict with the reality of workplace-based learning. Preceptors may be better able­and more motivated­to document student performance that occurs as a natural part of everyday work. Nurturing social learning ecosystems could facilitate workplace-based learning such that, across specialties, students acquire a comprehensive clinical skillset appropriate for graduation.

If You Build It, Will They Come? Exploring the Impact of Medical Student Engagement on Clerkship Curriculum Outcomes.

Introduction: Inconsistent or superficial access to workplace learning experiences can impede medical students' development. Well-designed clerkship curricula provide comprehensive education by offering developmental opportunities in and out of the workplace, explicitly linked to competency objectives. Questions remain about how students engage with clerkship curriculum offerings and how this affects their achievement. This study investigated student engagement as the source of an apparent clerkship curriculum malfunction: increasing rate of substandard summative clinical competency exam (SCCX) performance over 3 years following curriculum reform. Materials and Methods: We sampled from three cohorts of US medical students (classes of 2018-2020) based on their post-clerkship SCCX performance: substandard (N = 33) vs. exemplary (N = 31). Using a conceptually based, locally developed rubric, a five-person team rated students' engagement in a curriculum offering designed to provide standardized deliberate practice on the clerkship's competency objectives. We examined the association between engagement and SCCX performance, taking prior academic performance into account. Results: Rate of substandard SCCX performance could not be explained by cohort differences in prior academic performance. Student engagement differed across cohorts and was significantly associated with SCCX performance. However, engagement did not meaningfully predict individual students' SCCX performance, particularly in light of prior academic performance. Discussion: Engagement with a particular learning opportunity may not affect clerkship outcomes, but may reflect students' priorities when navigating curricular offerings, personal learning goals, and curriculum policy. Proposing four patterns of engagement in clerkship learning, this study prompts reflection on the complex interaction among factors that affect engagement and outcomes.

Regenerated hair cells in the neonatal cochlea are innervated and the majority co-express markers of both inner and outer hair cells.

After a damaging insult, hair cells can spontaneously regenerate from cochlear supporting cells within the first week of life. While the regenerated cells express several markers of immature hair cells and have stereocilia bundles, their capacity to differentiate into inner or outer hair cells, and ability to form new synaptic connections has not been well-described. In addition, while multiple supporting cell subtypes have been implicated as the source of the regenerated hair cells, it is unclear if certain subtypes have a greater propensity to form one hair cell type over another. To investigate this, we used two CreER mouse models to fate-map either the supporting cells located near the inner hair cells (inner phalangeal and border cells) or outer hair cells (Deiters', inner pillar, and outer pillar cells) along with immunostaining for markers that specify the two hair cell types. We found that supporting cells fate-mapped by both CreER lines responded early to hair cell damage by expressing Atoh1, and are capable of producing regenerated hair cells that express terminal differentiation markers of both inner and outer hair cells. The majority of regenerated hair cells were innervated by neuronal fibers and contained synapses. Unexpectedly, we also found that the majority of the laterally positioned regenerated hair cells aberrantly expressed both the outer hair cell gene, oncomodulin, and the inner hair cell gene, vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGlut3). While this work demonstrates that regenerated cells can express markers of both inner and outer hair cells after damage, VGlut3 expression appears to lack the tight control present during embryogenesis, which leads to its inappropriate expression in regenerated cells.

Predictors of Professional Fulfillment and Burnout Among Otolaryngologists During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Objective: The goal of this study is to assess burnout and professional fulfillment during the initial weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic among otolaryngology practitioners. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: International survey of otolaryngologists during a pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was performed from April 24 to May 8, 2020, via email and social media platforms to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on otolaryngology practitioners in academic and private practice. The Professional Fulfillment Index was used to assess professional fulfillment and burnout. Burnout was divided into work exhaustion and interpersonal disengagement. Results: Of 243 respondents, 202 completed the Professional Fulfillment Index portion of the survey. An average score ≥3 on the professional fulfillment section correlates with fulfillment, while an average score ≥1.33 on the burnout section correlates with burnout. The average score of professional fulfillment was 2.17, with 85.6% of respondents reporting lack of professional fulfillment. The average score on burnout was 1, with 40.1% of otolaryngologists reporting burnout. In multivariable analyses, females were found to have statistically lower professional fulfillment (beta = -2.28, P = .010) with higher rates of work exhaustion (beta = 0.62, P < .001), interpersonal disengagement (beta = 2.08, P = .023), and burnout (beta = 4.49, P = .002). Conclusion: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, most participants reported a lack of professional fulfillment while just under half experienced burnout. Female gender was associated with low professional fulfillment and high work exhaustion, interpersonal disengagement, and burnout. Attention to burnout and job satisfaction during a pandemic is critical for the appropriate well-being of otolaryngology practitioners.

Objective Assessment of Aerosolization During Transnasal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review is to assimilate the literature on objective assessment of particulate aerosolization during transnasal endoscopic procedures. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and hand-searched articles. REVIEW METHODS: The PubMed electronic database was searched using Medical Subject Headings and free-text search terms relating to aerosolization and transnasal endoscopic procedures from inception to November 16, 2020. References were hand-searched to identify additional publications for consideration. Inclusion in the systematic review required quantification of aerosol generation during clinic transnasal endoscopic procedures. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and flowchart were followed during the systematic review. RESULTS: Eight of 900 studies met criteria for inclusion in the systematic review. Five studies tested nasal endoscopy with mixed findings on the risk of aerosol generation during this procedure. Two studies assessed flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy and also reported mixed findings. Breathing, sneezing, speech, and spray anesthetic/decongestants were found to consistently increase aerosol generation above baseline. A number of studies tested new and general mitigation strategies and were found to be effective in decreasing aerosol generation. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has informed many considerations regarding patient and provider safety. It is valuable to understand the risk during outpatient otolaryngology procedures through the quantification of aerosolization. There are several effective methods to control aerosolization during these procedures. The findings of this systematic review will inform appropriate precautions to protect against spread of infectious agents by aerosolization.

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Cancer Screening in a Rural Population.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To quantify the prevalence of provider recommendation and receipt of oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer (OCPC) screening and (2) to examine the factors associated with OCPC screening recommendation and receipt among adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Rural counties in central Illinois. METHODS: This study among adults (N = 145) was conducted between January 1 and June 30, 2017. The outcomes of interest were provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between (1) sociodemographic, health care access and utilization, and OCPC risk factors and (2) provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening. RESULTS: The prevalence of provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening was 12.4% and 28.3%, respectively. Approximately 15% of current smokers, 13% of participants who consume alcohol, and 10% of participants with ≥5 lifetime sexual partners had received an OCPC screening recommendation. OCPC screening rates were 19% for current smokers, 30% for those who consume alcohol, and 32% for those with ≥5 lifetime sexual partners. In the adjusted analyses, respondents with ≥5 partners (adjusted odds ratio, 3.10 [95% CI, 1.25-7.66]) had a higher odds of receiving OCPC screening than those with <5. There were no significant associations between other OCPC risk factors and provider recommendation and receipt of OCPC screening. CONCLUSION: OCPC screening recommendation and receipt were low; only number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with OCPC screening receipt. Our findings suggest that rural populations may be vulnerable to late-stage diagnosis of OCPC, and interventions to help improve screening rates are warranted.

On pandemics and pivots: a COVID-19 reflection on envisioning the future of medical education.

The required adjustments precipitated by the coronavirus disease 2019 crisis have been challenging, but also represent a critical opportunity for the evolution and potential disruptive and constructive change of medical education. Given that the format of medical education is not fixed, but malleable and in fact must be adaptable to societal needs through ongoing reflexivity, we find ourselves in a potentially transformative learning phase for the field. An Association for Medical Education in Europe ASPIRE Academy group of 18 medical educators from seven countries was formed to consider this opportunity, and identified critical questions for collective reflection on current medical education practices and assumptions, with the attendant challenge to envision the future of medical education. This was achieved through online discussion as well as asynchronous collective reflections by group members. Four major themes and related conclusions arose from this conversation: Why we teach: the humanitarian mission of medicine should be reinforced; what we teach: disaster management, social accountability and embracing an environment of complexity and uncertainty should be the core; how we teach: open pathways to lean medical education and learning by developing learners embedded in a community context; and whom we teach: those willing to take professional responsibility. These collective reflections provide neither fully matured digests of the challenges of our field, nor comprehensive solutions; rather they are offered as a starting point for medical schools to consider as we seek to harness the learning opportunities stimulated by the pandemic.

Risk Factors for Infection After Minor Dermatologic Procedures: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited published data regarding the incidence and risk factors for infection after minor dermatologic procedures, such as skin biopsy, shave, and curettage. Prior studies of infection risk after dermatologic procedures have often not specified the method of preparation of local anesthetic. OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and risk factors for infection after minor procedures performed in a general dermatology clinic using buffered lidocaine prepared in office. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, the medical record was searched for cases of infection after skin biopsies, shaves, conventional excisions, and destructions performed in a general dermatology clinic over a 4-year period. Patient and procedure characteristics were compared with uninfected controls. RESULTS: Of 9,031 procedures performed during the study period, there were 34 infections (0.4%). The odds of infection for procedures on the arm and leg were 5.29 and 9.28 times higher, respectively, than those on the head/neck. There was no significant effect of age, sex, smoking, immunosuppression, diabetes, or anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection is low after minor dermatologic procedures performed with local anesthesia using buffered lidocaine prepared in office. There is a higher risk of infection on the arm and leg compared with the head and neck.

Development and Assessment of an Otolaryngology-Specific Surgical Priority Scoring System.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and assess an otolaryngology-specific surgical priority scoring system that incorporates varying levels of mucosal involvement. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: A novel mucosal score was developed based on best available evidence. This mucosal score was incorporated into the Medically Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) score to generate a MeNTS-Mucosal (MeNTS-M) score. A retrospective cohort of patients was identified to assess the surgical priority scoring systems. Inclusion criteria included all scheduled surgical procedures between March 23, 2020, and April 17, 2020. Decisions about whether to proceed or cancel were made based on best clinical judgment by surgeons, without use of any surgical priority scores. The predictive value of the surgical priority scoring systems was assessed in this retrospective cohort. RESULTS: The median MeNTS score was significantly lower in adult patients whose surgery proceeded compared to those for whom the surgery was cancelled (48 vs 56; P = .004). Mucosal and MeNTS-M scores were not statistically different based on whether surgery proceeded. Among adult patients, the highest area under the curve (AUC) was for the MeNTS scoring system (0.794); both the mucosal and MeNTS-M systems had lower AUC values (which were significantly lower than the AUC for the MeNTS scoring system). CONCLUSION: This study represents development and assessment of the first otolaryngology-specific surgical priority score and incorporates varying levels of mucosal disruption. The combined MeNTS-M scoring system could be a valuable tool in appropriately triaging otolaryngology-head and neck surgery procedures.

Zika virus-induced brain malformations in chicken embryos.

BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) was confirmed to be related to microcephaly in 2016. However, there is still a need for understanding the embryonic morphological changes induced by ZIKV and when they occur. Here, chicken embryos were chosen as experimental model of ZIKV to evaluate virus-associated morphological alterations that might take place during embryonic development. METHODS: A screening with different viral doses was conducted in embryos at HH Stage 10-12 (E1.5) as well as a follow up of the first 5 days postinfection (dpi) was performed to observe the main morphologic changes post ZIKV infection. RESULTS: ZIKV exposed embryos presented a higher prevalence of mortality and defects such as brain malformation when compared to controls. Moreover, we observed that the phenotypes become more evident at 4dpi, when the viral load quantification reaches a peak. CONCLUSIONS: We found that ZIKV exposed embryos presented a high prevalence of mortality and central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities in a dose-dependent manner. The phenotype was more evident 4 days postinfection, when the viral load quantification reached a peak.